<?xml version="1.0" encoding="utf-8"?>
<feed xmlns="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom" xmlns:media="http://search.yahoo.com/mrss/">
    <title>SnagsNest</title>
    <link href="https://snagsnest.com/feed.xml" rel="self" />
    <link href="https://snagsnest.com" />
    <updated>2026-09-13T23:30:53+01:00</updated>
    <author>
        <name>The Snag</name>
    </author>
    <id>https://snagsnest.com</id>

    <entry>
        <title>I Have No Idea What I&#x27;m Doing</title>
        <author>
            <name>The Snag</name>
        </author>
        <link href="https://snagsnest.com/i-have-no-idea-what-im-doing.html"/>
        <id>https://snagsnest.com/i-have-no-idea-what-im-doing.html</id>

        <updated>2026-09-05T12:49:46+01:00</updated>
            <summary type="html">
                <![CDATA[
                    I have no idea what I'm doing. It's a rejection of conforming to patterns to get traffic, in favour of self expression. It's a rejection of the so-called collective wisdom which says you need to put yourself out there and grin like an idiot while&hellip;
                ]]>
            </summary>
        <content type="html">
            <![CDATA[
                <p>I have no idea what I'm doing.</p>
<figure class="post__image">But that's ok<br><br>Its an experiment. It's a notebook<br><br>Just putting the process out there. See what comes<br><br>A creative process in real time.<br><br><img loading="lazy"  src="https://snagsnest.com/media/posts/1/seacaptain.gif" alt="Sea Captain, &quot;yearr I've no idea what I'm doin.&quot;" width="400" height="300"></figure><br><br>Is it pretentious? Certainly. <br><br>Could it wind up being abandoned like so many other blogs I've started before?<br>Quite possibly.<br><br>Does that make it a waste of time? Unlikely.<br><br>Will I learn something valuable along the way? Invariably.<br><br>And that's the whole point.<br><br>The creative act is rarely done for strategic reasons. <br><br>This is all about zigging while the whole world zags. <br><br>It's a rejection of algorithms in favour of curation. </p>
<p>It's a rejection of conforming to patterns to get traffic, in favour of self expression.<br><br>It's a rejection of the so-called collective wisdom which says you need to put yourself out there and grin like an idiot while you get churned up on social media, in favour of a return to the old web of anonymous weirdos. (The good kind of anonymous weirdos.)<br><br>It's a rejection of autogenerated fakery, in favour of hard-slog and authenticity.<br><br>A machine could never make something like this, it's too random<br><br>8.31 billion - that's how many people are on this planet right now, according to the great god Google. 8,312,823,625 if you want to be exact. <br><br>99.9% of 8,312,823,625 billion is a lot of people to try and be friends with, and I've met enough to know that's a fool's errand. </p>
<p>0.01% of 8,312,823,625 is what... I need a machine to help me here bear with me. </p>
<p>Nah, that's still WAY too much, too many numbers with too many commas...</p>
<p>0.0001% is 8,312, still too many. </p>
<p>0.0000001% of the world's population, that around 8.3 people, maybe on a good day I can bump that up to 9, that's a realistic target audience but let's be super optimistic and we'll say ten.</p>
<p>Ten people, out of 8.31 billion, yeah that's about right, that's about the number of people I connect with in the real world, my true friends, so it's a realistic target audience for a new website. </p>
<p>I mean, not if I want to monetize it obviously, but fuck all that shit. <br><br>I'm happy with an audience of ten people. </p>
<p>Or just one person. </p>
<p>If I can make just one person smile, just once. Then it's worth it.</p>
            ]]>
        </content>
    </entry>
</feed>
